🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined a collective professional network test this week after popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered favorable results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."